Atheism, Belief, Christianity, definitions, Faith, religion, Works.
Christianity focuses allot on beliefs. Faith is belief and trust in God. It’s important to “believe in Jesus” but before we get to what that might mean (another blog) let’s consider what it means to “believe” anything?
Although it is not a definition, IMO the best description of what it means to believe something was given by W.V. Quine and J.S. Ullian in their book “The Web of Belief.”
“Let us consider, to begin with. What we are up to when
we believe. Just what are we doing? Nothing in particular.
For all the liveliness of fluctuation of beliefs, believing is
not an activity. It is not like scansion or long division. We
may scan a verse quickly or slowly. We may perform a
division quickly or slowly. We may even be quick or slow
about coming to believe something, and quick or slow
about giving a belief up. But there is nothing quick or slow
about the believing itself; it is not a job to get on with. Nor
is it a fit or mood, like joy or grief or astonishment. It is
not something that we feel while it lasts. Rather, believ
ing is a disposition that can linger latent and unobserved.
It is a disposition to respond in certain ways when the
appropriate issue arises. To believe that Hannibal crossed
the Alps is to be disposed, among other things, to say “Yes”
when asked. To believe that frozen foods will thaw on the
table is to be disposed, among other things, to leave such
foods on the table only when one wants them thawed.
Inculcating a belief is like charging a battery. The bat
tery is thenceforward disposed to give a spark or shock,
when suitably approached, as long as the charge lasts.
Similarly the believer is disposed to respond in character
istic ways, when suitably approached, as long as the belief
lasts. The belief, like the charge, may last long or briefly.
Some beliefs, like the one about Hannibal, we shall proba
bly retain while we live. Some, like our belief in the
dependability of our neighborhood cobbler, we may abandon
tomorrow in the face of adverse evidence. And some,
like the belief that a bird chirped within earshot, will
simply die of unimportance forthwith. The belief that the
cobbler is dependable gives way tomorrow to a contrary
belief, while the belief in the bird is just forgotten. A
disposition has ceased in both cases, though in different
In this quote, we can see what the authors say, “[belief] is a disposition to respond in certain ways when the appropriate issue arises.” I read this description of belief early in my studies in philosophy and never felt the need to stray from it. As Quine and Ullian explain through their examples, the response can be an action or an utterance on our behalf. Sometimes I don’t think there is an actual action but our response might be internal/mental. E.g., when you hear something that doesn’t sound right. You will tend to think through your beliefs to check why that doesn’t sound right. But you still have the reaction.
To be sure, there are, perhaps some controversies which can arises in a definition that links belief so closely with action, especially in the field of morals where we talk about beliefs of what we should or shouldn’t do. I think it is clear that we can imagine examples where people do wrong even though they will correctly say they’ve always believed they should do otherwise. For example, someone may believe they should return library books on time. Their failure to return the book on time does not necessarily mean they did not believe they should return it on time. That said, their failure to return the book might indeed be an indicator that the strength of their belief was quite weak. To use the battery analogy, the charge that that belief holds is not very strong.
Despite some difficulties when we are dealing with moral beliefs about what we should do and whether someone can hold those beliefs and still not act appropriately, I still believe that a person’s actions can often be a better indicator of what they believe than their claims. For example, someone may say that they believe they will go to hell if they do not go to church every Sunday. If that person does not go to church every Sunday, I believe we are entitled to question whether they truly hold that belief. Actions often reveal beliefs better than words.
The other issue that can come up with beliefs is whether we have the capacity to change our beliefs. There is no question whether our beliefs can change. But what amount of control do we have over our beliefs? I don’t think we need to really delve into this question more than to state we have some control over our beliefs.
Whether that control is direct or indirect and the extent of the control is somewhat irrelevant to our task. If it were true that we had absolutely no control over our beliefs, then it would be wrong to assign culpability to people who have stubborn, irrational beliefs. At least if we believe that it is wrong to blame them for something that they have no control over.
Ive never read that definition of belief but I enjoy it. I recently started toying around with the idea that maybe beliefs just “are”. As far as action and belief go, I feel as if someone may perform an action in order to maintain a particular belief system and could potentiall
Not truly believe what the idea or concept itself. This happens often in religion. I call it the package deal effect. Can you believe in the trinity but not the resurrection? The new testament but not the old? The divinity of Jesus but not the Bible?
On another note, knowledge or lack there of is one of the many things that contributes to a belief. People choose to actively ignore or ponder particular pieces of knowledge that come their way. In this way, I think, we contribute to our beliefs. But the rest just occurs beyond our conscious control. I may be wrong, but this makes a lot of sense to me. Good post.
Thank you for your reply.
I am glad you enjoy it. I realize that talking about how we define these terms will seem dull going for many people. But I think what it means “to believe” is very important for the Christian.
With respect to your first two paragraphs I am not 100% sure I understand what you mean. Do you mean people might never consciously think about the trinity but they did consciously think about the resurrection and therefore they know they should be Christian and Christians teach the trinity so that just sort of got tacked on without there really consciously thinking about it. I think that happens. I still think they believe in the trinity – at least according to Quine who I quoted. Because if that person was asked do you believe in the trinity the person would be disposed to answer yes. Now the strength of the belief might vary. And I think strength of beliefs are important.
Just a couple of quick points:
1) This is important to the whole faith and works debate between Catholics and protestants. And I think James basically takes the view along the lines of this description. And this understanding pretty much eliminates the dispute.
2) Hume argued that there is a unbridgeable gap between belief and action. But I think it his view is needlessly complicated and misguided. But nevertheless Hume’s views are much discussed so you should at least know they exist.
3) I think a very valuable notion when it comes to belief is that of a “noetic structure.” Think of it as the total construction of all of our beliefs. Some think this construction is like a building. Some beliefs rest on other foundational beliefs others are foundational beliefs which don’t really rest on other beliefs. Quine argued that really beliefs should be viewed more like strands in a web than a building. Some you can take away a strand as long as you adjust your other beliefs so as not to destroy the web. Some beliefs of course will require more adjusting. In my experience theists tend to view belief in God as foundational. That is many other beliefs are resting on that belief and removing it does allot of damage to the building or web whatever. Atheists will often say “well I just don’t believe in God” as if that belief can easilly be removed from their noetic structure sort of like just we are just removing a wreath from the front door. Not really effecting much of our other noetic structure. This of course does not apply to all atheists.
With respect to your last post. I think you make an interesting point. Yes we seem to have some control over our beliefs but exactly how much is hard to say. Maybe it is sort of like surfing we can kind of pick our direction but not entirely.
That said if i ever get to talking about why it is rational for people to believe Christian I hope eventually someone complain that they can’t make themselves believe even if they are supposed to. I have some advice for them at that point but it might be a long way to get there.
There is so much that could be said on this topic.
Pingback: True and Reasonable
kinderklamotten ebay kleinanzeigen said:
Ich fasse das Oberthema bei Emmas mal etwas weiter, denn was hier gebrauchen kann Einkaufstaschen.
san diego hookah lounges said:
A subsequent search of the realm with the help of San Diego Police Division led to a gun being recovered.
Pingback: Two Aspects of Rational “Belief” | True and Reasonable
I hope you will investigate meaning “faith” as considered by author of book of Hebrews see 11:1
Hi Tom thanks for reading. I address that passage here: